AI + Life

How Fear Disguises Itself
as Wisdom in Every Generation

Every generation had a new technology. Every generation resisted it. Every generation was wrong. Here’s why that matters right now — especially if you’re a person of faith.

I’m a Christian. I’m also someone who used AI to build a 124,000+ line real estate software platform from scratch without a coding degree. And I’m writing this because I’m watching the exact same movie play out that has played out for the last 600 years — and most people in the church don’t even realize they’re in it.

Here’s the pattern. A new technology shows up. Religious people call it dangerous. They warn that it will destroy the church, corrupt the faithful, or replace God. Some preach against it from the pulpit. Others flat-out ban it. And then, without fail, God uses that exact technology to spread the Gospel further than anyone imagined.

Every. Single. Time.

This isn’t an opinion. It’s the historical record. And if you think AI is somehow different — that this time the fear is justified, that this time caution really is wisdom — I need you to read what happened with every tool that came before it.

Because the people who feared the printing press said the same thing you’re saying now. Word for word.

The 1440s — 1500s

The Printing Press: “Only Clergy Should Read the Bible”

Before Gutenberg built his press, the Bible existed almost entirely in Latin. Hand-copied. Locked inside monasteries. Controlled by the clergy. Ordinary people couldn’t read Scripture for themselves — they could only hear what the priest decided to share.

Then the printing press changed everything. And the institutional Church panicked.

A medieval scriptorium — monks hand-copying manuscripts before the printing press
Before the press, every copy of Scripture was made by hand — one page at a time.

Bible translations into common languages were treated as more dangerous than anything else. More threatening than explicit material. More threatening than political dissent. The idea that regular people could read the Bible for themselves terrified the people in charge.

In 1559, the Catholic Church published the first official Index of Forbidden Books — a direct response to how the Reformation was using the printing press. That list eventually grew to more than 4,000 titles and 3,000 authors. Reading a banned book was considered a mortal sin. The Index wasn’t officially discontinued until 1966. Think about that. Four hundred years of trying to control what people could read.

5B+ Bibles have been printed since Gutenberg. He started with about 180 copies in the 1450s. Today, more than 100 million are sold every year.

Martin Luther called the printing press “God’s highest and extremest act of grace.” Between 1517 and 1525, Luther published over half a million works. His 95 Theses became the first viral document in European history. The press gave voice to people who otherwise had none — including women like Argula von Grumbach who published pieces supporting the Reformation.

The core fear was this: if ordinary people can read and interpret Scripture for themselves, they won’t need the Church. Authority will collapse.

The opposite happened. The Bible reached more people in more languages than at any point in human history. The Reformation reshaped Western civilization. And God used the exact technology the institution tried to suppress.

The 1840s

The Telegraph: The First Message Was a Bible Verse

On May 24, 1844, Samuel Morse sent the first official telegraph message over a 38-mile line from the U.S. Capitol to Baltimore. The message was from Numbers 23:23 (NLT): “What has God done!”

This wasn’t random. Morse was the son of a prominent preacher. He was a devout Christian who saw his invention as divinely ordained. After the successful demonstration, he wrote to his brother: “It is His work, and He alone could have carried me thus far.” Near the end of his life, he requested any memorial in his honor carry the inscription: “Not unto us, not unto us, but to God, be the glory.”

Within 30 years, there were 650,000 miles of telegraph wire connecting cities across the globe. Missionaries used it to coordinate international efforts at speeds that would’ve been unimaginable a generation earlier. The technology that some thought was “playing God” literally opened its existence with Scripture.

The 1920s — 1940s

Radio: “Can the Holy Spirit Work Through a Machine?”

When radio became a public medium in the early 1920s, preachers were — in the words of the National Religious Broadcasters — “fascinated but cautious.” The central question was deeply theological: Could the anointing be transmitted through a crackling box?

A 1930s family gathered around a wooden radio — the new technology of the era
Families gathered around the radio the way they now gather around screens.

At the time, in-person crusades were the standard. The idea that a machine could replace the sacred, face-to-face encounter between preacher and congregation felt wrong to a lot of people. Major broadcast networks were wary of evangelical programming. In 1943, the Mutual Broadcasting System tried to stop selling airtime for religious programs entirely.

But Christians didn’t just adapt to radio. They were some of the first people to use it. The first known religious broadcast happened on January 2, 1921 — the technology’s very first year of public availability. By the 1940s, Charles Fuller’s Old Fashioned Revival Hour aired on more than 650 stations and reached an estimated 10 million listeners. His ministry was spending 50% more on airtime than the network’s next-largest secular customer.

Billy Graham’s Hour of Decision launched on radio and helped build one of the most influential ministries of the 20th century. The technology people feared would “replace the church” became the single most powerful tool for reaching people who would never walk through a church door.

The 1950s — 1970s

Television: “The Devil’s Box”

Television got a stronger reaction than radio. Many conservative Christians called it “the devil’s box.” Some pastors preached that owning a TV was incompatible with godly living. Certain denominations banned television ownership into the 1970s and beyond. The fear was that worldly entertainment — violence, materialism, sexual content — would flow directly into the Christian home.

A 1950s living room with a cathode ray television — what many called the devil's box
The “devil’s box” — a term used in conservative Christian homes for decades.

And the fear wasn’t completely irrational. Television did bring content into homes that Christians found objectionable. But the deeper concern was the same one it’s always been: this will empty the pews. Why would families come to Sunday evening service if they could watch Ed Sullivan instead?

3.2M+ People responded to the invitation to accept Christ at Billy Graham Crusades over his six-decade ministry — a ministry made possible by television.

By 1957, Oral Roberts’s broadcast reached 80% of the possible television audience. Rex Humbard’s programs eventually spanned 695 stations in 91 languages. Pat Robertson founded the Christian Broadcasting Network in 1961. The 700 Club went on to broadcast in 39 languages across 138 countries.

The technology Christians called “the devil’s box” put the Gospel in front of tens of millions of people who would never have walked into a church. The televangelism movement had its flaws. But the reach was undeniable. And it happened because some believers chose to use the tool instead of fear it.

The 1990s — 2000s

The Internet: “A Tool of Satan”

The internet probably got the most widespread religious opposition since the printing press. The concerns were real: pornography was suddenly free and anonymous. Anyone could publish theology with zero accountability. Many pastors told their congregations to stay offline entirely. Some Christian authors published books warning the internet was designed to corrupt believers and fracture the church.

A late 1990s desktop computer glowing in a dark room — the early internet era
The technology that “would destroy the church” became its most powerful distribution tool.

The language was often apocalyptic. Some drew direct lines between the internet’s global reach and Revelation’s prophecies about worldwide systems of control. Sound familiar? That exact argument is being made about AI right now.

Then YouVersion happened.

The YouVersion Bible app launched on the very first day of the Apple App Store — July 10, 2008. One of the first 200 mobile apps ever created. Within its first weekend, 83,000 people installed it. By 2013, 100 million downloads. By 2021, 500 million. And in November 2025, YouVersion hit one billion device installs. It now offers over 3,600 Bible translations in more than 2,300 languages. More than 80% of those downloads came from outside the United States.

The technology Christians feared would destroy the church became the single most effective Bible distribution tool in human history.

Bible Gateway launched in 1993 as one of the earliest websites making Scripture freely searchable online. Churches that built websites and started streaming services looked “ahead of their time” — until COVID hit and online church was the only church available for months. The people who had adapted were ready. The people who had resisted scrambled.

The 2010s

Social Media: “A Breeding Ground for Vanity”

Social media drew criticism on every front. Vanity. Comparison. Distraction from God. Shallow relationships replacing real community. Pastors preached sermon series warning about the spiritual dangers of Facebook, Instagram, and Twitter. And honestly? Some of those concerns were legitimate. Research does link heavy social media use with anxiety and depression.

A smartphone displaying faith-based content — social media as a platform for the Gospel
The platform Christians warned against became how millions first encountered faith content.

But here’s what happened while the church was debating whether Christians should be on social media: social media became the primary way young people first encountered faith content. Short-form videos on TikTok, Instagram, and YouTube brought Scripture, worship music, and teaching to millions of people who would never have sought it out in a church building.

Pastors like Steven Furtick and Craig Groeschel built followings that extended their reach far beyond their physical congregations. Social media enabled rapid mobilization for disaster relief, prayer movements, and mission trip fundraising at speeds the church had never seen. Online small groups, digital Bible studies, and faith-based podcasts created entirely new forms of Christian community.

The pattern repeated. The tool Christians feared as an engine of vanity became a megaphone for the Gospel.

The 2020s

Artificial Intelligence: “Playing God” or Stewarding a Tool?

And now we’re here. AI. And the same cycle is running at full speed.

Some faith leaders have linked AI to the Mark of the Beast in Revelation 13. Others have raised questions about whether AI chatbots could channel demonic spirits. Some pastors describe AI as “absolutely disturbing” and connect it to the False Prophet’s ability to perform convincing “miracles.” I’ve seen the YouTube videos. I’ve read the blog posts. The fear is real, and it’s spreading fast.

A modern workspace with AI tools and an open Bible — technology and faith coexisting
AI as a workspace tool — not a replacement for faith, but an extension of stewardship.

But here’s what’s also happening. 91% of church leaders now support AI use in ministry. 64% of pastors use AI for sermon preparation. AI is being used to accelerate Bible translation projects that used to take decades. It’s creating accessibility tools for disabled believers. It’s freeing pastors from administrative work so they can spend more time with people.

Major denominations aren’t sitting this one out. The Southern Baptist Convention released an evangelical statement on AI signed by over 70 leaders that said: “Christians must not fear the future or any technological development because we know that God is, above all, sovereign over history.” In 2023, the SBC adopted what is believed to be the first denominational resolution on AI, calling believers to engage it “from a place of eschatological hope rather than uncritical embrace or fearful rejection.”

The Catholic Church published its most comprehensive AI document in January 2025, distinguishing between human intelligence — which engages reality through the full scope of one’s being — and artificial intelligence, which is merely functional.

“See, I am doing a new thing! Now it springs up; do you not perceive it?”

Isaiah 43:19 (NLT)

I used AI to build a 124,000-line property risk platform. Not as a replacement for thinking — as a tool that multiplied what I could build. A Bible sat on my desk the entire time. My faith informed every business decision. The AI didn’t replace God in the process. It was another tool in the workshop.

And here’s the stat that should stop every church leader in their tracks: 73% of churches have no AI policy. Not against AI. Not for AI. Just no plan at all. That’s not wisdom. That’s avoidance. And if this pattern holds — and it has held for 600 years — the churches that engage now will lead. The ones that don’t will scramble later.

The Fear is Never New. The Regret Always Is.

Look at what every era has in common. The core fear is always some version of: this technology will replace God, replace the church, or corrupt the faithful. And every single time, the technology disrupted existing power structures, scared the people in charge, and then became one of the most powerful tools for spreading the Gospel that has ever existed.

Dominoes falling through time — each representing a technology era from printing press to AI
Seven eras. Seven waves of resistance. Seven tools God redeemed.

The printing press took 50+ years for the church to fully adopt. Radio took less than 5. Social media took months. AI opposition and adoption are happening at the same time. The cycle is compressing. Which means the window to choose — fear or faith, resistance or stewardship — is shrinking.

“His master replied, ‘Well done, my good and faithful servant. You have been faithful in handling this small amount, so now I will give you many more responsibilities. Let’s celebrate together!’”

Matthew 25:23 (NLT) — The Parable of the Talents

In the Parable of the Talents, the servant who buried his resource out of fear was condemned. Not praised for being “cautious.” Not rewarded for “playing it safe.” Condemned. The ones who took what they were given and multiplied it were the ones who heard “well done.” Fear-based inaction has never been a biblical virtue.

Fear versus faith — one person in shadow, another in golden light Hands building — old tools and new technology working together

You Get to Choose Which Side of History You’re On

I’m not telling you to blindly trust AI. I’m not saying there aren’t legitimate concerns. There are. Every technology has been used for both good and evil. The printing press spread the Reformation and also spread propaganda. Television brought the Gospel into living rooms and also brought garbage. The internet gave us YouVersion and also gave us every dark corner you can imagine.

The tool is never the problem. The heart behind it is.

A timeline scroll showing technology icons from quill to AI — the full arc of innovation
600 years. Same pattern. Different tools. Same God.

Paul wrote in 1 Corinthians 9:22 (NLT): “I have become all things to all people so that by all possible means I might save some.” All possible means. The printing press was a means. Radio was a means. The internet was a means. AI is a means. Paul didn’t say “all means except the ones that scare you.”

“Whatever you do, work at it with all your heart, as working for the Lord, not for human masters.”

Colossians 3:23 (NLT)

God doesn’t need AI. He doesn’t need any technology. But He has consistently chosen to work through every communication tool humanity has ever created. The question was never “is this tool safe?” The question was always “whose hands is it in?”

A modern church sanctuary with stained glass windows casting digital-patterned light
The light still comes through the windows. It just looks different now.

Resist if you want. Wait if you want. Call it the devil’s work if that makes you feel safe. People said the same thing about the printing press, the radio, and the internet. Every single one of them was wrong. And every single time, the people who chose faith over fear were the ones God used to reach the next generation.

The tool changes. The fear doesn’t. But neither does God. Damian Martinez

A note about the images on this page. Every image you see here was designed by me — I came up with each concept, wrote the initial direction, and then used AI to render them. It took multiple rounds of revisions and edits until each one matched the vision. That’s the point. AI didn’t replace my creativity. It executed my creativity at a speed I couldn’t have achieved alone. That’s stewardship.

Keep Reading

Join builders, founders, and operators who think long-term.

Join The Weekly Intel

There are people chatting with AI and people building with it. The gap isn't skill — it's a system. Mondays I share mine. Fridays I break down what's happening in the world and why it matters to entrepreneurs, builders, and people who are one decision away from starting with AI.

Join builders, founders, and operators who think long-term.